Praxis Applied

The measurement substrate for the AI economy.

A registry of human-built rubrics and a settlement layer for measurable improvement. Evaluate artifacts against transparent standards. Rewards verified progress rather than estimated effort.

Pay and get paid for the delta, not the hours.

Hourly billing existed because quality was hard to quantify. Xantus evaluates the document itself — where it started, where it ended, and measures what changed in between.

The three acts

Measurement. Agreement. Settlement.

Every Xantus interaction passes through three layers. Each layer serves a single purpose and stays focused on that role.

01

Measurement

Score an artifact against a certified rubric.

An artifact is uploaded. A rubric — a human-authored measurement instrument with defined grading criteria, weighted categories, and scoring anchors — produces a per-criterion score, a written justification, and a normalized result on a 0–100 scale. Every evaluation is recorded as a public ledger event.

02

Agreement

Two parties bind to a rubric and a baseline.

A payor and a payee enter a Lift agreement: a starting score, a target or per-unit improvement formula, a face value, and a deadline. The rubric becomes the neutral standard. Neither party can alter it. Neither party owns it.

03

Settlement

Money moves on the measured delta.

When the artifact is re-scored, the contract auto-settles against its terms. The payor pays for measured lift. The payee earns based on what changed. The rubric author receives a share from every official evaluation. Every settlement remains fully auditable.

The Catalog

A registry of certified measurement instruments.

Every rubric in the Catalog is human-authored, version-locked, and reviewable by anyone. The criteria are explicit. The weights are public. The scoring guidance is on the page.

Pick a rubric. Upload an artifact. Get back a structured evaluation with a per-criterion scorecard and a written justification for each score. The result lives in a public Vault — referenceable, durable, audit-grade.

Rubrics are scoped to a domain: writing, business plans, technical specifications, performance reviews, supplier assessments. Each version is immutable. When the author improves the rubric, it becomes v2 — never a silent edit of v1.

Every run pays the rubric's author. Authors keep the majority share. The platform takes a small cut to maintain the registry. The split is published with every result.

How the money moves
Each evaluation has a run price set by the rubric's author. Authors are paid on every run — published rubrics generate revenue indefinitely. There is no monthly subscription. Pay only for the measurements you take.
Lift

Performance contracts with a referee built in.

Xantus does not price value; it measures lift.
Payor

Commits a face value.

The artifact owner escrows the agreement amount when the contract is accepted. If the payee never delivers measured improvement, the escrow is refunded.

Payee

Earns on measured delta.

The worker does the improvement offline, using the published rubric to iterate. Payout fires when the re-scored artifact meets the agreement terms.

Rubric

Serves as the independent standard.

The rubric author receives their per-run fee on each evaluation and has no stake in the agreement outcome. They were paid once, when the rubric was published.

How it works in practice

A founder, a freelance pitch consultant, and a rubric.

  1. Jane has a Series B pitch deck for a supply chain logistics software company. She comes to the exchange, finds a rubric built for logistics SaaS pitch decks, pays a $5 evaluation fee, and gets an initial score of 54 / 100.
  2. She wants to raise the score before sending to investors. She returns to the exchange, browses the freelancer marketplace, reads reviews, and selects Alex — a pitch consultant she trusts who prefers outcome-based work over hourly billing.
  3. Jane opens a Lift agreement. Counterparty: Alex. Baseline: her prior evaluation. Target: 90 / 100. Face value: $300. Max runs: 3. Deadline: two weeks.
  4. Alex accepts.
  5. Jane places $300 in escrow on the platform.
  6. Alex downloads the rubric PDF and works offline, iterating against the published criteria. Confident he has reached 90, he returns to the exchange and uploads the revised deck for his first official rescore. The rubric scores it: 89 / 100. Close, but not there. He goes back offline.
  7. After more adjustments, Alex returns to the exchange and uploads again for his second official rescore. The rubric scores it: 92 / 100. Target met.
  8. The agreement auto-settles. Alex receives his payment, net of processing. Jane is refunded for the one unused rubric run. The rubric author receives their share for the two official scores that ran. Every line of the settlement is visible on the public ledger.

No timesheets. No “good faith effort.” No subjective debate over whether the work was worth its price. The measurement decides.

Sign up

Two ways in.

Start free. Move to full participation when you're ready to author, transact, or run private evaluations.

Free
$0

For browsing the registry and running public evaluations.

  • Browse the full Catalog of certified rubrics
  • Run any public rubric
  • See the public Vault (private events redacted)
  • Inspect any Settlement Proof on a public evaluation
Sign up free
Paid
$2.99/ month

For full participation in the Xantus economy.

  • Everything in Free
  • Run private rubrics you're entitled to
  • See the full Vault, no redactions
  • Initiate or accept Lift agreements
  • Submit your own rubrics for certification
  • Personal Economic Dashboard with royalty & usage ledgers
Sign up — $2.99 / month